Socw 6311 wk 3responses | SOCW 6311 – Social Work Practice Research II | Walden University

  

SOCW 6311 WK 3responses 

Respond to at least two colleagues each one has to be answered separately name first then response 

Bottom of Form

Respond to at least two colleagues by doing all of the following:

· Offer an analysis of their evaluations and subsequent recommendation. Note both strengths and areas that could be improved.

· Identify areas where your own original recommendations or evaluation was similar to or different from your colleagues’ original evaluation and explain why.

·  

Instructor wants lay out like this:

Respond to at least two colleagues ( 2 peers posts are provided) by doing all of the following:

Identify strengths of your colleagues’ analyses and areas in which the analyses could be improved.

Your response

Address his or her evaluation of the efficacy and applicability of the evidence-based practice,

Your response

[Evaluate] his or her identification of factors that could support or hinder the implementation of the evidence-based practice,

Your response

And [evaluate] his or her solution for mitigating those factors.

Your response

Offer additional insight to your colleagues by either identifying additional factors that may support or limit implementation of the evidence-based practice or an alternative solution for mitigating one of the limitations that your colleagues identified.

Your response

References

Your response

PEER 1

Cedric Brown 

Cedric Brown 

RE: Discussion – Week 3

COLLAPSE

Post an evaluation of the proposed study design described in the case study file.

The proposed study design that was described in the case study file was a multiple-baseline, single-subject design. The study was explained to participants at the geriatric case management program and informed consent was required to participate (Plummer, Makris, & Brocksen, 2014). Also, the case managers used a rating scale that branched from the task-centered model. Before every session, the case manager and client would collaboratively evaluate how they think the tasks were met utilizing a 10-point scale. They would also evaluate the changes to problems the client had on a 10-point scale as well (Plummer, Makris, & Brocksen, 2014). Utilizing this would allow both parties to see growth and where they may need to focus more attention.

Explain whether the outcome of Chris’ study with her client George would lead you to adopt the model of case management with solution-focused and task-centered approaches.

After reviewing the two charts that were provided in the case study, my observation is that the client had made progress in the three areas that were assessed. I would adopt the model of case management with solution-focused and task-centered approaches for several reasons. One reason is that this particular research project yielded positive results. It is a collaborative effort, and when the client feels like they have stake in the treatment process, the outcomes tend to be better for the clients. Finally, I feel as if the use of the clinical rating scale allows for a clear indicator as to why the solution-focused and task-centered approach is working as shown by the numbers provided weekly.

Provide recommendations for improvements should Chris and her colleagues wish to submit the study to the evidence-based practice registry.

One improvement that I would suggest that could better the chances with the evidence-based practice registry is to have a definite design study to utilize. For example, since the project is new, the use of a One-group Posttest-Only Design is ideal because they are simple and take less time (Dudley, 2014). This design is also great at identifying if simple answers have an effect on the intervention (Dudley, 2014). Whether they choose this design or not, I think having a consistent design will help build validity within the program.

Cedric

Reference

Dudley, J.R. (2014). Social work evaluation: Enhancing what we do. (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL:

Lyceum Books.

Plummer, S.-B., Makris, S., & Brocksen, S. (Eds.). (2014b). Social work case studies:

Concentration year. Baltimore, MD: Laureate International Universities Publishing. [Vital

Source e-reader].

Peer 2

Katie Otte 

Katie Otte Initial Post-Discussion – Week 3

COLLAPSE

Top of Form

Post an evaluation of the proposed study design described in the case study file.

The study design presented in the case study is a multiple baseline, single-subject design (Plummer, Makris, & Brocksen, 2014b).  A single-subject design involves establishing baseline data on the behavior or interest of change.  Next, an intervention(s) is introduced and the behavior or interest is observed to determine if there is any change (Mattaini, 2010).  In a multiple baseline study, more than one interest or behavior is being observed.  In the study design presented, the social worker chose three interests to observe.  These include mobility, home safety, and personal care.

The study was done over a 7 week period and used a critical rating scale to measure the tasks that were completed each week for each of the areas of interest (Plummer, Makris, & Brocksen, 2014b).  Additionally, a critical rating scale was used to measure the success of the areas of change (Plummer, Makris, & Brocksen, 2014b).  These were done collaboratively with the client providing feedback and the social worker providing observation.  

Explain whether the outcome of Chris’s study with her client George would lead you to adopt the model of case management with solution-focused and task-centered approaches, and substantiate your choice.

The outcome of the study provided me with adequate information to consider using a case management model with a solution-focused and task-centered approach.  First, I believe the collaborative approach in selecting the areas of interest is important for overall success.  Additionally, the study showed a correlation between increased task completions and an increase in the scores for those identified areas (Plummer, Makris, & Brocksen, 2014b). According to Thyer Therefore, this study showed that a focus on tasks relating to specific areas resulted in positive changes.  

Provide recommendations for improvements should Chris and her colleagues wish to submit the study to the evidence-based practice registry. Include a rationale for your recommendations.

I believe the study, as it is currently designed, does not establish adequate rigor which is necessary for inclusion in the evidence-based registry.  One factor to determine rigor in SSR studies is the extent to which other alternative explanations can be ruled out (Mattaini, 2010).  This study, in my opinion, did not rule out other alternative explanations for the improvement in George’s circumstances, therefore, should not be included in the registry.   

References

Mattaini, M. A. (2010). Single-system studies. In B. Thyer (Ed.), The handbook of social work research methods (2nd ed., pp.241–274). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. 

Plummer, S.-B., Makris, S., & Brocksen S. (Eds.). (2014b). Social work case studies: Concentration year. Baltimore, MD: Laureate International Universities Publishing. [Vital Source e-reader]. 

Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

We value our customers and so we ensure that what we do is 100% original..
With us you are guaranteed of quality work done by our qualified experts.Your information and everything that you do with us is kept completely confidential.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

The Product ordered is guaranteed to be original. Orders are checked by the most advanced anti-plagiarism software in the market to assure that the Product is 100% original. The Company has a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism.

Read more

Free-revision policy

The Free Revision policy is a courtesy service that the Company provides to help ensure Customer’s total satisfaction with the completed Order. To receive free revision the Company requires that the Customer provide the request within fourteen (14) days from the first completion date and within a period of thirty (30) days for dissertations.

Read more

Privacy policy

The Company is committed to protect the privacy of the Customer and it will never resell or share any of Customer’s personal information, including credit card data, with any third party. All the online transactions are processed through the secure and reliable online payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By placing an order with us, you agree to the service we provide. We will endear to do all that it takes to deliver a comprehensive paper as per your requirements. We also count on your cooperation to ensure that we deliver on this mandate.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency