Project 01 | Marketing homework help

  
Subject Name: Project Management Processes 

The journal indicated below describes a national project. Based on the journal, and understanding of the project, answer the questions 

below: DOI: 10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000332 

 Journal title: “1976 Montreal Olympics: Case Study of Project Management Failure”

 1. Was it an internal or external project? Provide a rationale.  5Marks 

2. Identify at least 10 major stakeholders for the project. 5 Marks 

3. What were the needs or expectations of each stakeholder? 5 Marks

 4. Identify and describe at least 5 most important resources used in the project. 5 Marks 

5. What was the alternative approach for the project (i.e. if the stadium had not been built, what else could have been done to ensure the Olympics still occurred)? 5Marks 

6. Based on (5) above, was building the stadium at this location and at this time the best approach to have been chosen?  Provide rationale using PV, NPV, IRR, B/C. [1 page]  20Marks 

7. Provide two Level 3 Work Breakdown Structures (WBS) for this project. These two should be the initial (or planned) and final (or actual) WBS. Explain the difference  [2 pages]  20Marks 

8. Based on (7), was there evidence of scope creep in the project? Provide a rationale. 5Marks  

9.  Create one network diagram for the project using the final WBS in (7) above [1 page]   30Marks 

10. Use the Level 2 tasks in the final WBS to create one GANTT chart for the project. [1 page]  30 Marks 

11. Use the initial and final WBS to create two high-level budgets for the project. These two should be the initial and final budgets. Explain the difference. [2 pages]  30Marks 

12. Using the risk sources, describe three major (broad) categories of risks in the project. 6 Marks 

13. Using a table, list at least ten individual risks ranked by severity, and also link each of them to one of the categories in (12) above [1 page ]    20Marks 

14. For each risk in (13) above, describe at least one thing that was done or could have been done to mitigate that risk.     5Marks 

15.Was their adequate quality management processes in place (including quality planning, quality assurance, and quality control)? Provide a rationale.   4Marks  

16. Was there adequate outsourcing in the project? Provide a rationale.  5 Marks 

17. The journal-title indicates this project was a failure. Do you agree? Provide a rationale.    5Marks

 18. If anyone in your group was appointed the project manager for this project, what would you have done differently to make this project successful?  5Marks

19.  Describe at least five major lessons that can be learned from this project.    5 Marks

20. Other – Abstract, Introduction, Conclusion (one paragraph each)    10Marks

 21. Other – Effective APA (Times New Roman, font size 12, double-spaced, in-text citations, grammar, reference list, etc)       10 Marks 22. Other Considerations   

                                5Marks TOTAL of 240 Marks

Side note from the instructor:

  1. Your response should be between 15 -20 pages only, including all auxiliary pages such as the Title page, Reference page, and Table of Content.
  2. This research project requires you to tie together the key components of project management.
  3. Ensure all responses you provide (including numbers and facts) are supported with information from the journal, or where necessary, provide appropriate assumptions and additional information from external sources. However, facts from the journal will trump all external sources. This journal including all other external sources should be correctly referenced.  
  4. Use effective APA in-text citation to help the reader know exactly where you are picking your facts from. 
Order a unique copy of this paper
(550 words)

Approximate price: $22

Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

We value our customers and so we ensure that what we do is 100% original..
With us you are guaranteed of quality work done by our qualified experts.Your information and everything that you do with us is kept completely confidential.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

The Product ordered is guaranteed to be original. Orders are checked by the most advanced anti-plagiarism software in the market to assure that the Product is 100% original. The Company has a zero tolerance policy for plagiarism.

Read more

Free-revision policy

The Free Revision policy is a courtesy service that the Company provides to help ensure Customer’s total satisfaction with the completed Order. To receive free revision the Company requires that the Customer provide the request within fourteen (14) days from the first completion date and within a period of thirty (30) days for dissertations.

Read more

Privacy policy

The Company is committed to protect the privacy of the Customer and it will never resell or share any of Customer’s personal information, including credit card data, with any third party. All the online transactions are processed through the secure and reliable online payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By placing an order with us, you agree to the service we provide. We will endear to do all that it takes to deliver a comprehensive paper as per your requirements. We also count on your cooperation to ensure that we deliver on this mandate.

Read more

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
$26
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Urgency